A Puritan Prayer Book: Valley of Vision

I’ve been spending time recently reading, thinking and praying through a collection of Puritan prayers and devotions called The Valley of Vision. The Puritans were thorough in their study, which spilled over into their prayers. Second only to the Psalms, these prayers are a great means of stretching our own verbage as we petition the throne of grace. Below is a personal favorite:

PRAISE AND THANKSGIVING

O MY GOD,

Thou fairest, greatest, first of all objects,

my heart admires, adores, loves thee,

for my little vessel is as full as it can be,

and I would pour out all that fullness before thee in ceaseless flow.

When I think upon and converse with thee

ten thousand delightful thoughts spring up,

ten thousand sources of pleasure are unsealed,

ten thousand refreshing joys spread over my heart,

crowding into every moment of happiness.

I bless thee for the soul thou has created,

for adorning it, sanctifying it, though it is fixed in barren soil;

for the body though has given me,

for preserving its strength and vigour,

for providing senses to enjoy delights,

for the ease and freedom of my limbs,

for hands, eyes, ears that do thy bidding;

for thy royal bounty providing my daily support,

for a full table and overflowing cup,

for appetite, taste, sweetness,

for social joys of relatives and friends,

for ability to serve others,

for a heart that feels sorrows and necessities,

for a mind to care for my fellow-men,

for opportunities of spreading happiness around,

for loved ones in the joys of heaven,

for my own expectation of seeing thee clearly.

I love thee above the powers of language to express, for what thou art to they creatures

Increase my love, O my God, through time and eternity.

Something for the Calvinists in the Room

There can be something maddening about all the “friendly” debates seminarians find themselves pulled into. Perhaps one of the most prevalent is the Calvinism vs. Armenianism debate. I once mentioned I was a Calvinist in a seminary class and my professor jokingly responded, “Come on Andrew, let’s take the Bible seriously.” I laughed. But it is interesting how we discuss and joke about these issues in theological circles. Christians have their labels, but above all we should work towards unity in Christ. We need to learn how to discuss and engage issues we agree on, not merely the ones on which we disagree.

I was recently forwarded the following blog post. I find it witty and fairly accurate.

Check it our here:

Help! I’m Going Hyper!

Henri Nouwen on our Relationship with Christ

“Jesus has to be and become ever more the center of my life. It is not enough that Jesus is my teacher, my guide, my source of inspiration. It is not even enough that he is my companion on they journey, my friend and my brother. Jesus must become the heart of my heart, the fire of my life, the love of my soul, the bridegroom of my spirit. He must become my only thought, my only concern, my only desire.”

Pray for Myanmar

Many have probably already heard about the cyclone which devastated Myanmar this past weekend. Today, their government finally started letting international aid into the country. 22,000 people perished and entered eternity, ready or not (2,752 died in the 9/11 attacks). Here are specific ways to be praying for these people in the months to come:

Pray for the million people who are now homeless.

Pray for the 6.5 million residents of Yangoon currently without electricity.

Pray for those with the lack of food, water, and shelter.

Pray for peace; there is currently little military presence.

Pray for opportunities for the Gospel to be spread among the suffering. Pray for the national Christians there that they would be bold witnesses and compassionate servants for Christ.

Pray more countries around the world would respond.

Pray for the international church’s teachers and leaders as they place these events in perspective of who God is and what he does.

Pray that if and when such a catastrophe might hit you and your loved ones that your faith would be strong enough to glorify God through it.

When is my IRS Rebate Check Supposed to Show Up?

Good question. here’s the latest from ABC News…

Monday, 3/17/08 UPDATE: IRS Finally Releases Mailing Dates

If you file your return on time and request that your federal income tax refund is directly deposited, the stimulus payments will directly go into your bank account by May 2 if the last two digits of your Social Security number are 00-20.

If the last two digits are 21-75, the date to remember is May 9.

If the last two digits are 76-99, you’d get that money by May 16.

But if you do not use direct deposit to get your federal income tax refund – or you are paying taxes owed when you file that 2007 return – you’re going to get your tax rebate check later. The rollout times are more complicated, too.

If your last two digits of your Social Security number are 00-09, you could expect that rebate check to be mailed by May 16.

It’s by May 23 if the last two digits are 10-18.

It’s May 30 if the digits are 19-25.

It’s June 6 if the digits are 26-38.

It’s June 13 if the digits are 39-51.

It’s June 20 if the digits are 52-63.

It’s June 27 if the digits are 64-75.

It’s July 4 if the digits are 76-87.

It’s by July 11 if the digits are 88 -99 and the person did not use direct deposit of a refund this year – or if you wrote a check to cover money owed for the 2007 tax year.

Note: an email going around for several weeks gave the dates in an August - October range. The email was incorrect.

N.T. Wright: Christians Wrong About Heaven

I wasn’t in seminary very long before I came in contact with the writings and thoughts of N.T. Wright. His article in TIME magazine last month is a powerful reminder about what Christians should hope for:
Christians Wrong About Heaven, Says Bishop

The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted: The China Study

The China Study
I’m re-reading a book I picked up last summer and found quite intriguing. When I’m not reading for class or for pleasure, I read nutrition books. I very rarely ever assimilate what I learn completely, but somehow I feel I’m pursuing better health by reading those who do.
Last summer, I found a book that made some big claims. Here are some quotes from the backcover:
Everyone in the field of nutrition science stands on the shoulders of Dr. Campbell, who is one of the giants in the field. This is one of the most important books about nutrition ever written - reading it may save your life. ~Dean Ornish, MD
…a well-documented analysis of the fallacies of the modern diet, lifestyle and medicine… ~Sushma Palmer, PhD
…the most important book on nutrition and health to come out in the last seventy-five years. ~David Klein
…Colin studies the relationship between diet and disease, and his conclusions are startling. ~Robert C. Richardson, PhD
The science is clear. The results are unmistakable. Change your diet and dramatically reduce your risk of cancer, heart disease, diabetes and obesity.
The book is The China Study by T. Colin Campbell PhD and his son Thomas M. Campbell. I began reading it last June, excited to learn how to eat healthier and learn something new. What I learned from the book was definitely interesting and even convincing, but such a struggle to assimilate.
The authors wrote this work after conducting one of the most intense and thorough scientific studies on nutrition ever conducted. This project surveyed “a vast range of diseases and diet and lifestyle factors in rural China.” It eventually provided 8,000 statistically significant associations between various dietary factors and disease.
In a nutshell, The China Study includes thorough discussions on the current health epidemic, including several diseases of affluence (heart disease, obesity, diabetes, cancers, and autoimmune diseases); how to eat well; and how science, government and big medicine are working hard to hide the truth from Americans.
The only problem I have with this study is the difficulty of living out their conclusions. They basically conclude the main cause of the major diseases listed above are animal-based proteins. The book that claims to hold the nutritional answers is clearly suggesting a vegan lifestyle.
This creates quite an obstacle: I like meat, in fact, I like meat a lot. I eat quite a bit of the stuff in various forms. But I also believe The China Study is most likely accurate. If I ate vegan the rest of my life, barring accidental death, I’m convinced I would be healthier and live longer. Can I honestly turn my back on this truth and keep eating myself towards a much higher likelihood of cancer, heart disease or diabetes??
The authors do assert eating less meat would be an improvement on most diets, but also compare this logic to the idea of smoking less cigarettes instead of quiting all together. They strongly recommend full commitment.
Lastly, I suspect this is more of a moral issue then I’d like to admit. I’m called by my Creator to steward my body as his temple:
Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body.
~1 Cor. 6:19-20
So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.
~1 Cor. 10:31
It is true that God allows humans to consume animals.  Jesus Christ, himself, served fish to the 4,000 and 5,000 and to his disciples post-resurrection.  Jesus also describes fish and eggs as good gifts from a father (Luke 11:11-13). Jesus would have never been able to consume meat with every meal, especially red meat (this was most likely consumed once a month or at major Jewish holidays).  Perhaps the Bible actually calls for balance in animal-protein consumption.
I continue to wrestle with the implications of The China Study. I’ll probably never completely give up eating animal proteins, but I might think hard about decreasing the amount in my diet; not merely to look and feel better, but to honor God with my body.

Powerful Letter to Senator Obama

Dr. Robert P. George, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University, has been one of the great defenders of the sanctity of life and traditional marriage in our time. One of his students, Sherif Gergis, a 2008 Princeton Graduate and Rhodes Scholar, has written a powerful letter to U.S. Senator Barack Obama on the subject of the protection of unborn human life:

The Audacity of Hope: A Second-Generational Query

Dear Senator Obama:

As an immigrant from Kenya, your father found new hope in America’s noble principles and vast opportunities. The same promise brought my parents here from Egypt when I was still too young to thank them. Now you have inspired my generation with your vision of a country united around the same ideals of liberty and justice, “filled with hope and possibility for all Americans.”

But do you mean it?

As a legislator, you have opposed every effort to protect unborn human life. Shockingly, you even opposed a bill to protect the lives of babies who, having survived an attempted abortion, are born alive. Despite your party’s broad support for legal abortion and its public funding, most Democrats (including Senator Clinton) did not oppose the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act. You, however, opposed it. Your vision of America seems to eliminate “hope and possibility” for a whole class of Americans: the youngest and most vulnerable. You would deny them the most basic protection of justice, the most elementary equality of opportunity: the right to be born.

As a prerequisite for any other right, the right to life is the great civil-rights issue of our time. It is what slavery and segregation were to generations past. Our response to this issue is the measure of our fidelity to a defining American principle: “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life.”

You have asked me to vote for you. In turn, may I ask you three simple questions? They are straightforward questions of fact about abortion. They are at the heart of the debate. In fairness, I believe that you owe the people you would lead a good-faith answer to each:

1. The heart whose beating is stilled in every abortion — is it a human heart?

2. The tiny limbs torn by the abortionist’s scalpel — are they human limbs?

3. The blood that flows from the fetus’s veins — is it human blood?

If the stopped heart is a human heart, if the torn limbs are human limbs, if the spilled blood is human blood, can there be any denying that what is killed in an abortion is a human being? In your vision for America, the license to kill that human being is a right. You have worked to protect that “right” at every turn. But can there be a right to deny some human beings life or the equal protection of the law?

Of course, some do deny that every human being has a right to life. They say that size or degree of development or dependence can make a difference. But the same was once said of color. Some say that abortion is a “necessary evil.” But the same was once said of slavery. Some say that prohibiting abortion would only harm women by driving it underground. But to assume so is truly to play the politics of fear. A compassionate society would never accept these false alternatives. A compassionate society would protect both mother and child, coming to the aid of women in need rather than calling violence against their children the answer to their problems.

Can we become a society that does not sacrifice some people to help others? Or is that hope too audacious? You have said that abortion is necessary to protect women’s equality. But surely we can do better. Surely we can build an America where the equality of some is not purchased with the blood of others. Or would that mean too much change from politics as usual?

Can we provide every member of the human family equal protection under the law? Your record as a legislator gives a resounding answer: No, we can’t. That is the answer the Confederacy gave the Union, the answer segregationists gave young children, the answer a complacent bus driver once gave a defiant Rosa Parks. But a different answer brought your father from Kenya so many years ago; a different answer brought my family from Egypt some years later. Now is your chance, Senator Obama, to make good on the spontaneous slogan of your campaign, to adopt the more American and more humane answer to the question of whether we can secure liberty and justice for all: Yes, we can.

Reason #372 I Love All Things Apple

apple-logo1.jpg

Last night, I realized my Ipod earbuds weren’t working properly. The part that I put in my ear was detaching from the rest. I took them into the local Apple store this morning to see if they could be repaired. The guy took one look at them and just gave me a new pair: “See if these work better for you.” What was amazing was they didn’t ask me a billion questions. Just saw they were broke and replaced them.

Apple claims to make things that “just work” which has been my general experience. It’s nice to know when something does break, they will do what they can to make it right. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, “I will never willingly buy another PC.”

Great Minds Quote Each Other

Renowned NT scholar Craig Blomberg quoted another renowned NT scholar, D.A. Carson, in my Epistles & Revelation class last Thursday.   I thought it was thought provoking:

Unless we think about suffering from the perspective of at least 50 trillion years into eternity, we have not even begun to think Christianly.

There is something very powerful and purifying about thinking about your life in terms of 50 trillion years into eternity.  Not only does it add significance to present sufferings, but it reveals the foolishness of certain forms of entertainment and leisure our culture lauds.  I don’t think we’ll spend time in eternity debating with friends which season of the Office was funniest, but I’m prone to just that here and now.

It takes great faith to honestly view our lives in reference to eternity, but what rich rewards await those who do.

Next Page »